|
The other Darwinian factor in evolution is Sexual Selection. It is that department of Natural Selection in which sex is especially concerned. Anything which exhibits the prowess or beauty of the one sex attracts the other, and decides the preference for one individual over another, with the result that those individuals which are unattractive to the opposite sex are unable to reproduce their kind. The importance of this factor will be appreciated if I give an extract from Darwin's "Descent of Man" (Vol. II., p. 367). "For my own part," wrote our great master, "I conclude that of all the causes which have led to the differences in external appearance between the races of men, and to a great extent between man and the lower animals, sexual selection must have been by fat the most efficient."
As I have already said, Darwin neither invented nor discovered the doctrine of Evolution. But he placed it upon a firm foundation by the discovery of the two great factors to which I have referred, and, by incessant observation and indomitable energy, he demonstrated the truth of them beyond any reasonable doubt.
The proofs of the truth of Evolution are of two kinds palaeontological and embryological. The palaeontological evidence has found its way into popular books, and even into some of the literary newspapers. The history of the horses, of the crocodiles, of the rhinoceros is known in detail. All the stages have been found which intervene between the four-toed Eohippos of the Lower Eocene and the zebra and horse of the present day. Thanks to the late Professor Marsh, of Yale, not only are the successive steps in the evolution of the foot structure preserved, but so also are the various stages in the evolution of the teeth. The occasional appearance of a three-toed horse points very plainly to a three-toed progenitor, a striking example of atavism, that is, the reappearance of a characteristic which has "skipped" one or more generations.
|
|
|
|
If the principle of heredity be true, one would expect to find in the development of animals, and plants traces of the line of descent. "If Evolution be true, one ought to find, following back the development of the egg, that specific details would vanish and give rise to more generalized features; that the earlier the stages, the more the embryos of related forms would resemble each other." This is exactly what is found, there being, in a vast number of instances, a remarkable parallel between the palaeontological record and the embryological evidence. A detailed examination of the facts would not be intelligible to anybody who is not a practical biologist; but I am fully warranted in asserting that every organism in the course of its life history (technically called ontogeny) is a recapitulation of the history of the race technically known as phylogeny.
There is other evidence in abundance. The phenomena named atavism is a part of that evidence. Almost everybody has seen well-defined and regular stripes upon horses, and nobody doubts that they indicate a zebra-like ancestor, Again, in the inner side of the human eye is a little red fold, known as the plica semilunaris, the remnant of all ancestor which possessed a third eyelid, similar to that possessed by some reptiles and birds of today.
Who are the supporters of the doctrine of Evolution? Practically the whole scientific world. The late Professor Marsh, the distinguished palaeontologist, when president of the American Association for the Advance of Science in 1878, said:
"I need offer no argument for Evolution, since to doubt evolution is to doubt science, and science is only another name for the truth." Professor Marsh meant, of course, not that evolution, is to be taken "on trust," but that it has been so thoroughly proved that new arguments in support of it are unnecessary.
Concerning Natural Selection, sometimes called Darwinism, the late Professor Huxley said (quotation from Darwin's "Life"): "I venture to affirm that so far as all my knowledge goes, all the ingenuity and all the learning of the hostile critics have not enabled them to adduce a single fact of which it can be said this is with the Darwinian theory."
|